04252024Thu
Last updateWed, 27 Mar 2024 6am

Correlation between intraoperative mapping and monitoring and functional outcomes following supratentorial glioma surgery

Han‑Lin Wua, Po‑Cheng Hsub, Sanford P. C. Hsuc, Chun‑Fu Linc, Kwong‑Kum Liaoc, Kai‑Ming Yanga, Chen‑Liang ChouaTsui‑Fen Yanga*
 
aDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; bDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Bei‑Hu Branch, Taipei, Taiwan; cDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
 

Download PDF

Open Access funded by Buddhist Compassion Relief Tzu Chi Foundation

Abstract
 
Objectives: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has long been regarded as the “gold standard” when resecting a supratentorial glioma, as it facilitates the goals of maximal tumor resection and preservation of sensorimotor function. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the ability of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) monitoring or subcortical mapping (SCM), alone or in combination, to predict postoperative functional outcomes in glioma surgery. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with supratentorial glioma that underwent craniotomy for tumor removal with IONM. Statistical analyses were used to evaluate whether the following criteria correlated with postoperative functional outcomes: Reduced amplitude (>50% reduction) or disappearance of MEPs (criterion 1), SCM with a stimulation intensity threshold less than 3 mA (criterion 2), the presence of both two phenomena (criterion 3), or either one of the two phenomena (criterion 4). Results: Ninety‑two patients were included in this study, of whom 15 sustained new postoperative deficits, 4 experienced improved functional status, and 73 were unchanged. Postoperative functional status correlated significantly with all four criteria, and especially with criterion 3 (r = 0.647, P = 0.000). Sensitivity of IONM was better if using criteria 2 and 4, but specificity was better if using criteria 1 and 3. Criterion 3 had the most favorable overall results. Conclusion: Using statistical methodology, our study indicates that concomitant interpretation of MEPs and SCM is the most accurate predictor of functional outcomes following supratentorial glioma surgery. However, accurate interpretations of the monitoring results by experienced neurophysiologists are essential.
 
Keywords: Functional outcome, Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, Motor evoked potentials, Subcortical mapping

 

 

 

On the Cover

Search all Issue